Startup
Pre-seed to Series A
The decisions made in the first year set the ceiling on everything after it.
Systems engineering, end to end - San Antonio, TX
I build systems across the whole life of a product - ideation, development, production, sales and support - because the same practice covers low-level circuit and silicon design and advanced IT automation. That range is the difference. Most firms hold one end of it and subcontract the other without telling you.
How I work
Most engagements start in the middle and discover the rest too late. These are the five stages, what each one actually asks, and which capabilities it draws on. I help build teams across that span and then work in them - how that works.
Can this be built, and should it?
Feasibility before enthusiasm. What the thing costs at volume, what physics and regulation allow, what the target architecture looks like, and whether the business case survives the engineering answer.
R&D and special projectsRF, electromagnetics and analogTechnical leadership and advisory
Make it real.
Circuit and silicon design, board bring-up, drivers and firmware, control logic, and the software and platforms above them - designed as one system rather than handed between four vendors.
Semiconductor and programmable logicEmbedded systems and device driversSoftware engineeringIndustrial automation and controls
Make it repeatable.
A working prototype is not a product. Design for manufacture, contract manufacturing and ODM work, certification, production test, and the infrastructure to deploy and scale what you have built.
Hardware manufacturing and supplyCloud and infrastructure architectureWater, power and energy systems
Make it sellable.
The commercial architecture around the technical one: how it is positioned, who sells it, what they demonstrate, and how a technical buyer is taken from interest to signature without the engineering being misrepresented.
Keep it alive.
The decade after launch. Operations and monitoring, sustaining engineering, security posture that still passes an audit in year three, supply chain and end-of-life planning for hardware that has to stay buildable.
Security engineeringGovernance, risk and complianceCloud and infrastructure architecture
Where this fits
The problem changes with size. The discipline does not - and I have worked at every one of worked, not studied.
See all fourPre-seed to Series A
The decisions made in the first year set the ceiling on everything after it.
Roughly 10-200 staff
Enough to lose, not enough to hire a CISO or a chief architect.
Roughly 200-2,000 staff
The stage where what worked informally stops working at all.
2,000+ staff, including F100
The architecture problem is rarely technical. It is that forty teams each solved it differently.
Capabilities
A high-level map. Each opens into what it means in practice, how deep it goes, who I bring in, and how to scope it.
Open the full capability statementIf something here is useful
Bring a question or a decision you are stuck on. I either help from an advisory seat inside your team, or I point you at the people who can get you there. Nothing is being sold.
Start a conversationWhen it belongs elsewhere
Some of what I get asked about belongs to a reseller, an integrator, a test house or an auditor. When that is the honest answer I say so and make the introduction, with no fee attached in either direction.
How that works